Theory in Determining Good and Bad in Human Actions

Authors

  • Zaskia Adea Mika Universitas Islam Negeri Palangka Raya
  • Paujianur Universitas Islam Negeri Palangka Raya
  • Fatimatus Azahra Putri Universitas Islam Negeri Palangka Raya
  • Dita Riani Universitas Islam Negeri Palangka Raya
  • Ajahari Universitas Islam Negeri Palangka Raya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63738/al-hukumah.v2i1.27

Keywords:

Theory, Good and Bad, Actions, Humans

Abstract

The concepts of good and bad are essential in understanding human behavior and the moral values that govern society. These concepts are often used as benchmarks to evaluate an individual’s actions and determine whether such actions are socially acceptable. They have been integral to human life since ancient times and continue to develop alongside changes in social, cultural, and religious contexts. In daily life, individuals frequently encounter situations that require moral judgment; therefore, understanding the concepts of good and bad is crucial for making appropriate decisions and behaving in accordance with established moral values. Moreover, these concepts influence our relationships with society and those around us, shaping personal identity and character. Throughout history, various philosophers and ethicists have proposed theories to explain how the concepts of good and bad are formed and how they can guide moral decision-making. Among the most prominent are consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics. This journal discusses the theories and concepts of good and bad in relation to human actions and examines their practical application in everyday life. Understanding these concepts can enhance moral awareness and support better decision-making in various situations. In addition, this paper explores how factors such as culture, religion, and personal experience contribute to shaping individuals’ perceptions of good and bad. Thus, this journal aims to provide a deeper understanding of these moral concepts and their relevance to human behavior. It is also expected to serve as a reference for readers who wish to further study ethical theories and the foundations of moral evaluation.

References

Al-Ghazali. (2008). Ihya’ Ulumuddin. (Terj. oleh Anwar). Jakarta: Pustaka Amani.

Anwar, R. (2008). Ilmu Akhlak. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.

Ibnu Miskawaih. (2013). Tahdzib al-Akhlak. Kairo: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.

Kant, I. (2002). Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mursal. (2023). Etika dan Akhlak dalam Perspektif Islam. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

Nata, A. (2013). Akhlak Tasawuf. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Qayyim, I. (2011). Madarij al-Salikin. Riyadh: Dar al-Salam.

Saebani, B. A., & Hamid, M. (2012). Ilmu Akhlak. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Ahmad Izzan dan Saehuddin. (2016).Tafsir Pendidikkan. Bandung : Humaniora.

Ajahari, M. (2024). Akhlak Tasawuf. Lakeisha.

Al Ghazali. (2008). Ihya’ Ulumuddin. Dar al Kutub al Ilmiyyah.

Ibnu Miskawaih. (2013). Tahdzib al-Akhlak. Kairo: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.

Kant, I. (2002). Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mursal. (2023). Etika dan Akhlak dalam Perspektif Islam. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

Nata, A. (2013). Akhlak Tasawuf. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Hadiwijono, Harun. (1980). Sari Sejarah Filsafat Barat. Jakarta: Kanisius

Ajahari, M. (2024). Akhlaq Tasawuf. Penerbit Lakeisha.

Al-Ghazali. (2005). Ihya’ Ulum al-Din. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Al-Syatibi. (1997). Al-Muwafaqat fi Usul al-Shari‘ah. Beirut: Dar al-Ma’rifah.

Ibn Miskawayh. (1968). Tahdzīb al-Akhlāq. Cairo: Dar al-Ma’arif.

Muslim, I. (n.d.). Sahih Muslim.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-27

How to Cite

Zaskia Adea Mika, Paujianur, Fatimatus Azahra Putri, Dita Riani, & Ajahari. (2025). Theory in Determining Good and Bad in Human Actions. Al-Hukumah: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Dan Studi Islam, 2(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.63738/al-hukumah.v2i1.27

Issue

Section

Articles